HACK vs IVV
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. HACK delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HACK | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.1B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 25 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +49.05% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +43.48% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +32.86% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.10% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 11, 2014 | May 15, 2000 |
HACK vs IVV Performance
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HACK returned +43.48% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, HACK is up 49.05% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, HACK compounded at +32.86% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +14.10% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, HACK has the edge at +14.57% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HACK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.7% for HACK and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HACK charges 0.60% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HACK currently yields 0.06% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
HACK and IVV share 9 holdings out of 520 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HACK or IVV?
HACK has an expense ratio of 0.60% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HACK or IVV?
Over the past year HACK returned +43.48% vs +21.79% for IVV, so HACK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), HACK annualized +14.57% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HACK or IVV?
HACK has been the more volatile fund at 20.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: HACK -42.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both HACK and IVV?
HACK and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HACK and IVV?
HACK and IVV share 9 common holdings with a 4.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 520 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HACK or IVV?
HACK yields 0.06% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.