HOMZ vs IVV
Hoya Capital Housing ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, HOMZ or IVV?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. HOMZ is less concentrated, with 20.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HOMZ | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $34M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.66% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 101 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -4.05% | +11.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | -8.67% | +15.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.47% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.21% | +12.66%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.4% | 16.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -48.2% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,711 | $18,149Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 20.0%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Hoya Capital Real Estate, LLC | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 19, 2019 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 20, 2019 to Sep 15, 2026 (7.5 years).
HOMZ vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.5 years both funds cover.
HOMZ vs IVV Performance
Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) is an ETF from Hoya Capital Real Estate, LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HOMZ returned -8.67% while IVV returned +15.96%. Year to date, HOMZ is down 4.05% versus a gain of 11.51% for IVV.
Over three years, HOMZ compounded at +7.47% per year against +21.01% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +3.21% and +12.66% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +15.27% annualized vs +9.28%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HOMZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.4% compared with 16.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.2% for HOMZ and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HOMZ charges 0.30% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HOMZ currently yields 2.66% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
38.5% of HOMZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.7% of IVV's money is in holdings HOMZ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
30 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in HOMZ and 490 in IVV, against full books of 101 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 452 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for HOMZ (96.0% of the fund), and 67 for HOMZ that do not appear in IVV (59.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HOMZ | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 3.03% | 0.49% | 2.54% |
| EQRVivmark Residential | 2.92% | 0.07% | 2.85% |
| LOWLowes Cos., Inc. | 2.77% | 0.17% | 2.60% |
| WELLWelltower, Inc. | 1.65% | 0.25% | 1.40% |
| VTRVentas Inc . | 1.56% | 0.07% | 1.49% |
| PHMPultegroup Inc. | 1.58% | 0.04% | 1.54% |
| NVRNvr Inc. | 1.56% | 0.03% | 1.53% |
| PSAPublic Storage | 1.47% | 0.08% | 1.39% |
| DHIDr Horton Inc. | 1.48% | 0.06% | 1.42% |
| ESSEssex Property | 1.49% | 0.03% | 1.46% |
38.5% of HOMZ is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HOMZ or IVV?
HOMZ has an expense ratio of 0.30% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HOMZ or IVV?
Over the past year HOMZ returned -8.67% vs +15.96% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), HOMZ annualized +9.28% vs +15.27% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HOMZ or IVV?
HOMZ has been the more volatile fund at 24.4% annualized versus 16.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: HOMZ -48.2% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both HOMZ and IVV?
HOMZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HOMZ and IVV?
38.5% of HOMZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.7% of IVV's is in holdings HOMZ also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in HOMZ and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, HOMZ or IVV?
HOMZ yields 2.66% while IVV yields 1.06%, so HOMZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than HOMZ?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. HOMZ is less concentrated, with 20.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.