HUMN vs IVV
Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HUMN | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $100M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +2.10% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.92% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 36.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 26, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
HUMN vs IVV Performance
Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HUMN returned +18.92% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, HUMN is up 2.10% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HUMN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.4% for HUMN and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HUMN charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HUMN currently yields 0.41% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
HUMN and IVV share 3 holdings out of 547 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HUMN or IVV?
HUMN has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HUMN or IVV?
Over the past year HUMN returned +18.92% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), HUMN annualized +20.09% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HUMN or IVV?
HUMN has been the more volatile fund at 36.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: HUMN -26.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both HUMN and IVV?
HUMN and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HUMN and IVV?
HUMN and IVV share 3 common holdings with a 4.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 547 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HUMN or IVV?
HUMN yields 0.41% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.