HUMN vs VTI
Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, HUMN or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HUMN | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $91M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 52 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -5.74% | +14.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | -6.17% | +16.83%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.56% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.76% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.0% | 11.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.9% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,417 | $12,902Best |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 26, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Oct 9, 2026 (1.3 years).
HUMN vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
HUMN vs VTI Performance
Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HUMN returned -6.17% while VTI returned +16.83%. Year to date, HUMN is down 5.74% versus a gain of 14.54% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HUMN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.0% compared with 11.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.9% for HUMN and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HUMN charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HUMN currently yields 0.41% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 7.7% of VTI's money is in holdings HUMN also owns.
Stated as a floor: for HUMN, our book for it covers 91.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and HUMN share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, HUMN as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
8 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in HUMN and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 52 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HUMN | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.91% | 6.40% | 3.49% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 5.88% | 1.22% | 4.66% |
| TERTeradyne Inc - Common | 2.44% | 0.08% | 2.36% |
| OUSTOuster Inc_None_None | 1.94% | 0.00% | 1.94% |
| VPGVishay Precision Group Inc | 1.65% | 0.00% | 1.65% |
| NOVTNovanta Inc. Common Stock | 1.55% | 0.01% | 1.54% |
| AMBAAmbarella, Inc. | 1.42% | 0.00% | 1.42% |
| ALNTAllient Inc | 1.36% | 0.00% | 1.36% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HUMN and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HUMN or VTI?
HUMN has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HUMN or VTI?
Over the past year HUMN returned -6.17% vs +16.83% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), HUMN annualized +10.73% vs +21.65% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HUMN or VTI?
HUMN has been the more volatile fund at 34.0% annualized versus 11.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: HUMN -27.9% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both HUMN and VTI?
HUMN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HUMN and VTI?
At least 7.7% of VTI's money is in holdings HUMN also owns. Our book for HUMN is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in HUMN and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, HUMN or VTI?
HUMN yields 0.41% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than HUMN?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.