HUMN vs QQQ
Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HUMN | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $100M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +0.43% | +17.89% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.94% | +26.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.02% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.59% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 36.0% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 26, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
HUMN vs QQQ Performance
Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year HUMN returned +12.94% while QQQ returned +26.35%. Year to date, HUMN is up 0.43% versus a gain of 17.89% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HUMN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.0% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.4% for HUMN and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HUMN charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HUMN currently yields 0.41% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
HUMN and QQQ share 4 holdings out of 143 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HUMN or QQQ?
HUMN has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HUMN or QQQ?
Over the past year HUMN returned +12.94% vs +26.35% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), HUMN annualized +18.10% vs +13.07% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HUMN or QQQ?
HUMN has been the more volatile fund at 36.0% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: HUMN -26.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both HUMN and QQQ?
HUMN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HUMN and QQQ?
HUMN and QQQ share 4 common holdings with a 5.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 143 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HUMN or QQQ?
HUMN yields 0.41% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.