HYTR vs VOO
Counterpoint High Yield Trend ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HYTR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.88% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $289M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.74% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +1.16% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.71% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.23% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.09% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.3% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Counterpoint Mutual Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 22, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
HYTR vs VOO Performance
Counterpoint High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) is a ETF from Counterpoint Mutual Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HYTR returned +3.71% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, HYTR is up 1.16% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, HYTR compounded at +6.23% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +2.09% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +1.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 5.3% for HYTR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.2% for HYTR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HYTR charges 0.88% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $88 vs $3 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HYTR currently yields 5.74% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
HYTR and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HYTR or VOO?
HYTR has an expense ratio of 0.88% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $85 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HYTR or VOO?
Over the past year HYTR returned +3.71% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), HYTR annualized +1.31% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HYTR or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 5.3% for HYTR. Worst drawdown: HYTR -14.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both HYTR and VOO?
HYTR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HYTR and VOO?
HYTR and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HYTR or VOO?
HYTR yields 5.74% while VOO yields 1.09%, so HYTR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.