IBFR vs IVV
Innovator International Developed Managed 10 Buffer ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IBFR or IVV?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IBFR is less concentrated, with 14.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBFR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $15M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.78% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 647 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +0.46% | +11.03%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.62% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.61% |
| Top 10 Weight | 14.0%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IBFR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IBFR vs IVV Performance
Innovator International Developed Managed 10 Buffer ETF (IBFR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, IBFR is up 0.46% versus a gain of 11.03% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBFR charges 0.85% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBFR currently yields 0.78% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.5% of IBFR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings IBFR also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
2 positions in common, counted across the 294 positions we hold weights for in IBFR and 490 in IVV, against full books of 647 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 480 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for IBFR (98.4% of the fund), and 9 for IBFR that do not appear in IVV (2.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IBFR and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBFR or IVV?
IBFR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBFR or IVV?
IBFR yields 0.78% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than IBFR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IBFR is less concentrated, with 14.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.