IBFR vs VXUS
Innovator International Developed Managed 10 Buffer ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, IBFR or VXUS?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBFR | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $20M | $163.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.92% | 2.38% |
| Holdings | 649 | 9,293 |
| YTD Return | -0.35% | +8.79%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +12.87% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.94% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.11% |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IBFR vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IBFR vs VXUS Performance
Innovator International Developed Managed 10 Buffer ETF (IBFR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, IBFR is down 0.35% versus a gain of 8.79% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBFR charges 0.85% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $5 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBFR currently yields 0.92% against 2.38% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 296 holdings in IBFR and 8,463 in VXUS, totalling 94.5% and 89.2% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 201 positions appear in both.
201 positions in common, counted across the 296 positions we hold weights for in IBFR and 8,463 in VXUS, against full books of 649 and 9,293.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IBFR | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSBA:LNHsbc Holdings Plc | 1.45% | 0.76% | 0.69% |
| SHELShell Plc | 1.44% | 0.62% | 0.82% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag - Common | 1.35% | 0.59% | 0.76% |
| NESN:SMNestle Sa | 1.16% | 0.52% | 0.64% |
| AZN:LNAstraZeneca PLC | 1.10% | 0.54% | 0.56% |
| SIE:SGSiemens N Ag | 1.08% | 0.50% | 0.58% |
| 6857:JPAdvantest Corp | 1.02% | 0.36% | 0.66% |
| BHP:AUBhp Group Ltd | 0.96% | 0.31% | 0.65% |
| IBE:MAIberdrola Sa | 0.88% | 0.35% | 0.53% |
| CBA:AUCommonwealth Bank Of Australia | 0.82% | 0.39% | 0.43% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IBFR and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBFR or VXUS?
IBFR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $80 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBFR or VXUS?
IBFR yields 0.92% while VXUS yields 2.38%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than IBFR?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.