IBFR vs QQQ
Innovator International Developed Managed 10 Buffer ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, IBFR or QQQ?
Option Writing against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBFR | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $20M | $437.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.92% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 649 | 208 |
| YTD Return | -0.35% | +10.43%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +8.78% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.14% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.29% |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IBFR vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IBFR vs QQQ Performance
Innovator International Developed Managed 10 Buffer ETF (IBFR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, IBFR is down 0.35% versus a gain of 10.43% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBFR charges 0.85% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $18 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBFR currently yields 0.92% against 0.43% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings IBFR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for IBFR, our book for it covers 94.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 296 positions we hold weights for in IBFR and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 649 and 208.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IBFR | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCEP:LNCoca-Cola Europacific Partners Plc | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.06% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IBFR and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBFR or QQQ?
IBFR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBFR or QQQ?
IBFR yields 0.92% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so IBFR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than IBFR?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.