IDE vs IVV

IDE vs IVV

Which is better, IDE or IVV?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IDE is less concentrated, with 13.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVLess Concentrated: IDE

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIDEIVV
Expense Ratio1.22%0.03%Best
AUM$174M$876.4B
Dividend Yield8.75%1.06%
Holdings267508
YTD Return+6.56%+12.39%Best
1Y Return+9.17%+16.61%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+20.97%+21.38%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+10.06%+13.51%Best
Volatility (annualized)19.9%14.4%Best
Max Drawdown-70.5%-33.9%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$16,149$18,844Best
Top 10 Weight13.7%Best37.8%
Fund FamilyVoya Investment ManagementiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 26, 2010May 15, 2000

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 27, 2010 to Sep 18, 2026 (16.6 years).

IDE vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IDE vs IVV Performance

Voya Infrastructure Industrials and Materials Fund (IDE) is an ETF from Voya Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IDE returned +9.17% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, IDE is up 6.56% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.

Over three years, IDE compounded at +20.97% per year against +21.38% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +10.06% and +13.51% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.89% annualized vs +0.32%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IDE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 14.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.5% for IDE and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IDE charges 1.22% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $122 vs $3 annually, a gap of $119 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDE currently yields 8.75% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

IDE already in IVV39.6%
IVV already in IDE10.6%

39.6% of IDE's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 10.6% of IVV's money is in holdings IDE also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

The two holdings books were reported 92 days apart, IDE as of May 31, 2026 and IVV as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

75 positions in common, counted across the 256 positions we hold weights for in IDE and 490 in IVV, against full books of 267 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 408 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for IDE (88.1% of the fund), and 18 for IDE that do not appear in IVV (8.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IDEWeight in IVVDifference
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares1.63%0.66%0.97%
GEGeneral Electric Co.1.54%0.53%1.01%
CATCaterpillar, Inc.1.28%0.55%0.73%
GEVGE Vernova Inc. CDR (CAD Hedged)1.06%0.36%0.70%
ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock1.11%0.30%0.81%
UNPUnion Pacific Corp1.06%0.27%0.79%
VZVerizon Communic0.94%0.32%0.62%
PHParker-Hannifin Corp.1.03%0.19%0.84%
UBERUber Technologies Inc0.99%0.23%0.76%
RTXRaytheon Co.0.79%0.42%0.37%

39.6% of IDE is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IDEIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IDE or IVV?

IDE has an expense ratio of 1.22% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $119 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IDE or IVV?

Over the past year IDE returned +9.17% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), IDE annualized +0.32% vs +12.89% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IDE or IVV?

IDE has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 14.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IDE -70.5% vs IVV -33.9%.

Should I hold both IDE and IVV?

IDE and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between IDE and IVV?

39.6% of IDE's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 10.6% of IVV's is in holdings IDE also owns. They hold 75 positions in common, counted across the 256 positions we hold weights for in IDE and 490 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, IDE or IVV?

IDE yields 8.75% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IDE currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than IDE?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IDE is less concentrated, with 13.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.