IDE vs IVV
Voya Infrastructure Industrials and Materials Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDE | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.22% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $174M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.81% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 267 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +14.21% | +13.74% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.87% | +21.54% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.59% | +22.61% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.30% | +13.31% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -70.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Voya Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2010 | May 15, 2000 |
IDE vs IVV Performance
Voya Infrastructure Industrials and Materials Fund (IDE) is a ETF from Voya Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IDE returned +20.87% while IVV returned +21.54%. Year to date, IDE is up 14.21% versus a gain of 13.74% for IVV.
Over three years, IDE compounded at +23.59% per year against +22.61% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +10.30% and +13.31% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +0.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IDE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.5% for IDE and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDE charges 1.22% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $122 vs $3 annually, a gap of $119 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDE currently yields 8.81% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
IDE and IVV share 78 holdings out of 683 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDE or IVV?
IDE has an expense ratio of 1.22% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $119 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IDE or IVV?
Over the past year IDE returned +20.87% vs +21.54% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), IDE annualized +0.75% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IDE or IVV?
IDE has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IDE -70.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IDE and IVV?
IDE and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IDE and IVV?
IDE and IVV share 78 common holdings with a 10.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 683 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDE or IVV?
IDE yields 8.81% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IDE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.