IFLN vs IVV
Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IFLN or IVV?
High Yield Bond against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IFLN is less concentrated, with 24.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IFLN | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.23% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $301M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.94% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 115 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +0.08% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.55% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.11% | +21.38%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.17% | +13.51%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.3%Best | 15.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -48.8%Best | -55.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,689 | $18,844Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 24.4%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | High Yield Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 15, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 15, 2007 to Sep 18, 2026 (18.8 years).
IFLN vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IFLN vs IVV Performance
Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF (IFLN) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IFLN returned +1.55% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, IFLN is up 0.08% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Over three years, IFLN compounded at +7.11% per year against +21.38% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +3.17% and +13.51% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.66% annualized vs -0.41%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 10.3% for IFLN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.8% for IFLN and -55.3% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IFLN charges 0.23% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $23 vs $3 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IFLN currently yields 5.94% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 111 holdings in IFLN and 490 in IVV, totalling 95.9% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in IFLN and 490 in IVV, against full books of 115 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 111 and 490 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 482 positions IFLN does not, 98.6% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.07%, AAPL 7.02%, MSFT 5.69%, AMZN 3.84%, GOOGL 3.00%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IFLN and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IFLN or IVV?
IFLN has an expense ratio of 0.23% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IFLN or IVV?
Over the past year IFLN returned +1.55% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), IFLN annualized -0.41% vs +9.66% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IFLN or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 10.3% for IFLN. Worst drawdown: IFLN -48.8% vs IVV -55.3%.
Should I hold both IFLN and IVV?
IFLN and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IFLN or IVV?
IFLN yields 5.94% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IFLN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than IFLN?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IFLN is less concentrated, with 24.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.