IFLN vs VOO
Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IFLN or VOO?
High Yield Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IFLN is less concentrated, with 24.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IFLN | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.23% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $301M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.94% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 115 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +0.08% | +12.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.55% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.11% | +21.37%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.17% | +13.49%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.7%Best | 14.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.0%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,689 | $18,827Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 24.4%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | High Yield Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 15, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 18, 2026 (16 years).
IFLN vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IFLN vs VOO Performance
Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF (IFLN) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IFLN returned +1.55% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, IFLN is up 0.08% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Over three years, IFLN compounded at +7.11% per year against +21.37% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +3.17% and +13.49% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.39% annualized vs +1.61%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 6.7% for IFLN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.0% for IFLN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IFLN charges 0.23% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $23 vs $3 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IFLN currently yields 5.94% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 111 holdings in IFLN and 494 in VOO, totalling 95.9% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in IFLN and 494 in VOO, against full books of 115 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 111 and 494 positions we hold weights for.
VOO holds 487 positions IFLN does not, 99.2% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.55%, AAPL 7.05%, MSFT 5.36%, AMZN 4.13%, GOOGL 3.24%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IFLN and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IFLN or VOO?
IFLN has an expense ratio of 0.23% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IFLN or VOO?
Over the past year IFLN returned +1.55% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IFLN annualized +1.61% vs +13.39% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IFLN or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 6.7% for IFLN. Worst drawdown: IFLN -24.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both IFLN and VOO?
IFLN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IFLN or VOO?
IFLN yields 5.94% while VOO yields 1.04%, so IFLN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than IFLN?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IFLN is less concentrated, with 24.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.