IFLR vs SPY
Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Which is better, IFLR or SPY?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. IFLR is less concentrated, with 14.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IFLR | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.09%Best |
| AUM | $98M | $814.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.94% | 1.01% |
| Holdings | 345 | 505 |
| YTD Return | +7.44% | +12.71%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +19.36% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.09% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.69% |
| Top 10 Weight | 14.2%Best | 38.0% |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 20, 2025 | Jan 22, 1993 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IFLR vs SPY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IFLR vs SPY Performance
Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Year to date, IFLR is up 7.44% versus a gain of 12.71% for SPY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IFLR charges 0.89% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $9 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IFLR currently yields 0.94% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 313 holdings in IFLR and 503 in SPY, totalling 96.2% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 313 positions we hold weights for in IFLR and 503 in SPY, against full books of 345 and 505.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 493 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for IFLR (99.4% of the fund), and 11 for IFLR that do not appear in SPY (4.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IFLR and SPY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IFLR or SPY?
IFLR has an expense ratio of 0.89% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $80 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IFLR or SPY?
IFLR yields 0.94% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPY better than IFLR?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. IFLR is less concentrated, with 14.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.