IFLR vs VTI
Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IFLR or VTI?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IFLR is less concentrated, with 14.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IFLR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $97M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.93% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 345 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +6.31% | +14.05%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.93% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.65% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.46% |
| Top 10 Weight | 14.3%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 20, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IFLR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IFLR vs VTI Performance
Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, IFLR is up 6.31% versus a gain of 14.05% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IFLR charges 0.89% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IFLR currently yields 0.93% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
0.5% of IFLR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's money is in holdings IFLR also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
2 positions in common, counted across the 309 positions we hold weights for in IFLR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 345 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,148 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for IFLR (97.3% of the fund), and 9 for IFLR that do not appear in VTI (3.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IFLR and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IFLR or VTI?
IFLR has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IFLR or VTI?
IFLR yields 0.93% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IFLR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IFLR is less concentrated, with 14.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.