IFLR vs VYM
Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, IFLR or VYM?
Option Writing against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. IFLR is less concentrated, with 14.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IFLR | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $98M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.94% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 345 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +7.44% | +14.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.43% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.16% |
| Top 10 Weight | 14.2%Best | 25.9% |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 20, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IFLR vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IFLR vs VYM Performance
Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, IFLR is up 7.44% versus a gain of 14.33% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IFLR charges 0.89% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $4 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IFLR currently yields 0.94% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
1.1% of IFLR's money is in holdings VYM also owns.
IFLR and VYM share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 313 positions we hold weights for in IFLR and 602 in VYM, against full books of 345 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 569 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for IFLR (97.2% of the fund), and 11 for IFLR that do not appear in VYM (4.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IFLR | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALV:STAutoliv, Inc. | 1.05% | 0.04% | 1.01% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IFLR and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IFLR or VYM?
IFLR has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $85 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IFLR and VYM?
1.1% of IFLR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.0% of VYM's is in holdings IFLR also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 313 positions we hold weights for in IFLR and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, IFLR or VYM?
IFLR yields 0.94% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than IFLR?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. IFLR is less concentrated, with 14.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.