IFLR vs VOO
Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IFLR or VOO?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. IFLR is less concentrated, with 14.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IFLR | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $98M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.94% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 345 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +7.44% | +12.74%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +19.43% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.76% |
| Top 10 Weight | 14.2%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 20, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IFLR vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IFLR vs VOO Performance
Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, IFLR is up 7.44% versus a gain of 12.74% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IFLR charges 0.89% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IFLR currently yields 0.94% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 313 holdings in IFLR and 504 in VOO, totalling 96.2% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 313 positions we hold weights for in IFLR and 504 in VOO, against full books of 345 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 494 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for IFLR (99.3% of the fund), and 11 for IFLR that do not appear in VOO (4.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IFLR and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IFLR or VOO?
IFLR has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IFLR or VOO?
IFLR yields 0.94% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than IFLR?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. IFLR is less concentrated, with 14.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.