IGR vs QQQ
CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.62% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $748M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.29% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 81 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +17.56% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.19% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.89% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.68% | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -90.9% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | CBRE Investment Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2004 | Mar 10, 1999 |
IGR vs QQQ Performance
CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund (IGR) is a ETF from CBRE Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IGR returned +11.19% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, IGR is up 17.56% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, IGR compounded at +10.89% per year against +26.64% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -0.68% and +15.36% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs -2.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 28.5% for IGR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -90.9% for IGR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGR charges 3.62% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $362 vs $18 annually, a gap of $344 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGR currently yields 15.29% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
IGR and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 180 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGR or QQQ?
IGR has an expense ratio of 3.62% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $344 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IGR or QQQ?
Over the past year IGR returned +11.19% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), IGR annualized -2.16% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IGR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 28.5% for IGR. Worst drawdown: IGR -90.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both IGR and QQQ?
IGR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IGR and QQQ?
IGR and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 180 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGR or QQQ?
IGR yields 15.29% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so IGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.