IGR vs IVV
CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.62% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $748M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.29% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 81 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +17.31% | +13.74% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.09% | +21.54% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.73% | +22.61% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.61% | +13.31% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -90.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | CBRE Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2004 | May 15, 2000 |
IGR vs IVV Performance
CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund (IGR) is a ETF from CBRE Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IGR returned +12.09% while IVV returned +21.54%. Year to date, IGR is up 17.31% versus a gain of 13.74% for IVV.
Over three years, IGR compounded at +11.73% per year against +22.61% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -0.61% and +13.31% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs -2.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -90.9% for IGR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGR charges 3.62% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $362 vs $3 annually, a gap of $359 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGR currently yields 15.29% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
IGR and IVV share 17 holdings out of 566 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGR or IVV?
IGR has an expense ratio of 3.62% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $359 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IGR or IVV?
Over the past year IGR returned +12.09% vs +21.54% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), IGR annualized -2.17% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IGR or IVV?
IGR has been the more volatile fund at 28.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IGR -90.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IGR and IVV?
IGR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IGR and IVV?
IGR and IVV share 17 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 566 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGR or IVV?
IGR yields 15.29% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.