IGR vs IVV
CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IGR or IVV?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.62% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $748M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 15.29% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 81 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +13.26% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.99% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.79% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.64% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.5% | 14.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -90.9% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,206 | $18,327Best |
| Fund Family | CBRE Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2004 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 25, 2004 to Sep 4, 2026 (22.5 years).
IGR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 22.5 years both funds cover.
IGR vs IVV Performance
CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund (IGR) is an ETF from CBRE Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IGR returned +4.99% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, IGR is up 13.26% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, IGR compounded at +10.79% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -1.64% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.21% annualized vs -2.32%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.5% compared with 14.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -90.9% for IGR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGR charges 3.62% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $362 vs $3 annually, a gap of $359 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGR currently yields 15.29% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.0% of IVV's money is in holdings IGR also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for IGR, our book for it lists positions totalling 143.8% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
IVV and IGR share little of their money.
15 positions in common, counted across the 81 positions we hold weights for in IGR and 504 in IVV, against full books of 81 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IGR | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WELLWelltower, Inc. | 11.74% | 0.25% | 11.49% |
| EQIXEquinix Inc - Common | 10.33% | 0.16% | 10.17% |
| AMTAmerican Tower Corp | 4.94% | 0.12% | 4.82% |
| AVBAvalonbay Communities Inc Avb | 3.62% | 0.04% | 3.58% |
| EXRExtra Space Storage Inc. Reit | 3.34% | 0.05% | 3.29% |
| VICIVici Properties Inc | 3.17% | 0.04% | 3.13% |
| VTRVentas, Inc. | 2.31% | 0.07% | 2.24% |
| REGRegency Centers Corp. | 2.35% | 0.02% | 2.33% |
| UDRUdr Inc (udr Un) | 2.24% | 0.02% | 2.22% |
| INVHInvitation Homes Inc | 1.90% | 0.03% | 1.87% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IGR and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGR or IVV?
IGR has an expense ratio of 3.62% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $359 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IGR or IVV?
Over the past year IGR returned +4.99% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), IGR annualized -2.32% vs +9.21% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IGR or IVV?
IGR has been the more volatile fund at 28.5% annualized versus 14.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IGR -90.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IGR and IVV?
IGR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IGR and IVV?
At least 1.0% of IVV's money is in holdings IGR also owns. Our book for IGR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 81 positions we hold weights for in IGR and 504 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGR or IVV?
IGR yields 15.29% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than IGR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.