IGR vs VYM
CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.62% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $748M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.29% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 81 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +17.56% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.19% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.89% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.68% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -90.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | CBRE Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2004 | Nov 10, 2006 |
IGR vs VYM Performance
CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund (IGR) is a ETF from CBRE Investment Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IGR returned +11.19% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, IGR is up 17.56% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, IGR compounded at +10.89% per year against +19.03% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -0.68% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.10% annualized vs -2.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -90.9% for IGR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGR charges 3.62% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $362 vs $4 annually, a gap of $358 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGR currently yields 15.29% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
IGR and VYM share 0 holdings out of 681 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGR or VYM?
IGR has an expense ratio of 3.62% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $358 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IGR or VYM?
Over the past year IGR returned +11.19% vs +24.22% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IGR annualized -2.16% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IGR or VYM?
IGR has been the more volatile fund at 28.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: IGR -90.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both IGR and VYM?
IGR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IGR and VYM?
IGR and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 681 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGR or VYM?
IGR yields 15.29% while VYM yields 2.24%, so IGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.