IGR vs VXUS
CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.62% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $748M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.29% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 81 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +17.56% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.19% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.89% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.68% | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -90.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | CBRE Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2004 | Jan 26, 2011 |
IGR vs VXUS Performance
CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund (IGR) is a ETF from CBRE Investment Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IGR returned +11.19% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, IGR is up 17.56% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, IGR compounded at +10.89% per year against +20.34% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -0.68% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.89% annualized vs -2.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -90.9% for IGR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGR charges 3.62% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $362 vs $5 annually, a gap of $357 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGR currently yields 15.29% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
IGR and VXUS share 30 holdings out of 7917 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGR or VXUS?
IGR has an expense ratio of 3.62% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $357 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IGR or VXUS?
Over the past year IGR returned +11.19% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IGR annualized -2.16% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IGR or VXUS?
IGR has been the more volatile fund at 28.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: IGR -90.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both IGR and VXUS?
IGR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IGR and VXUS?
IGR and VXUS share 30 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7917 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGR or VXUS?
IGR yields 15.29% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so IGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.