IGR vs VTI
CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2787 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.62% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $748M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.29% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 81 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +17.56% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.19% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.89% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.68% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.5% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -90.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | CBRE Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2004 | May 24, 2001 |
IGR vs VTI Performance
CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund (IGR) is a ETF from CBRE Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IGR returned +11.19% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, IGR is up 17.56% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, IGR compounded at +10.89% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -0.68% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -2.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.5% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -90.9% for IGR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGR charges 3.62% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $362 vs $3 annually, a gap of $359 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGR currently yields 15.29% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IGR and VTI share 27 holdings out of 2838 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGR or VTI?
IGR has an expense ratio of 3.62% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $359 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IGR or VTI?
Over the past year IGR returned +11.19% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), IGR annualized -2.16% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IGR or VTI?
IGR has been the more volatile fund at 28.5% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IGR -90.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IGR and VTI?
IGR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IGR and VTI?
IGR and VTI share 27 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2838 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGR or VTI?
IGR yields 15.29% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.