IGTR vs VYM
Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. IGTR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGTR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $20M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.67% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 110 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +17.33% | +14.84% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.58% | +20.88% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.29% | +18.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.04% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 17, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
IGTR vs VYM Performance
Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF (IGTR) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IGTR returned +36.58% while VYM returned +20.88%. Year to date, IGTR is up 17.33% versus a gain of 14.84% for VYM.
Over three years, IGTR compounded at +15.29% per year against +18.34% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, IGTR has the edge at +9.43% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IGTR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.1% for IGTR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGTR charges 0.80% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $4 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGTR currently yields 0.67% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
IGTR and VYM share 36 holdings out of 668 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGTR or VYM?
IGTR has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IGTR or VYM?
Over the past year IGTR returned +36.58% vs +20.88% for VYM, so IGTR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IGTR annualized +9.43% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IGTR or VYM?
IGTR has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: IGTR -20.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both IGTR and VYM?
IGTR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IGTR and VYM?
IGTR and VYM share 36 common holdings with a 10.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 668 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGTR or VYM?
IGTR yields 0.67% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.