IMFL vs VXUS
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. IMFL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IMFL | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $1.1B | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.91% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 884 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +15.43% | +14.98% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.65% | +25.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.04% | +19.65% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.51% | +9.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
IMFL vs VXUS Performance
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IMFL returned +26.65% while VXUS returned +25.63%. Year to date, IMFL is up 15.43% versus a gain of 14.98% for VXUS.
Over three years, IMFL compounded at +16.04% per year against +19.65% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +8.51% and +9.30% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IMFL has the edge at +9.17% annualized vs +4.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IMFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.3% for IMFL and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IMFL charges 0.34% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $5 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IMFL currently yields 2.91% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
IMFL and VXUS share 580 holdings out of 8038 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IMFL or VXUS?
IMFL has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $29 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IMFL or VXUS?
Over the past year IMFL returned +26.65% vs +25.63% for VXUS, so IMFL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IMFL annualized +9.17% vs +4.87% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IMFL or VXUS?
IMFL has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: IMFL -33.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both IMFL and VXUS?
IMFL and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IMFL and VXUS?
IMFL and VXUS share 580 common holdings with a 25.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8038 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IMFL or VXUS?
IMFL yields 2.91% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so IMFL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.