IMFL vs VXUS
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, IMFL or VXUS?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. IMFL led over 1Y, VXUS over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IMFL | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.91% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 884 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +13.14%Best | +12.82% |
| 1Y Return | +23.53%Best | +19.86% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.88% | +19.33%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.27% | +9.46%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 14.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.3% | -29.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,878 | $15,714Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2021 to Sep 18, 2026 (5.6 years).
IMFL vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.6 years both funds cover.
IMFL vs VXUS Performance
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IMFL returned +23.53% while VXUS returned +19.86%. Year to date, IMFL is up 13.14% versus a gain of 12.82% for VXUS.
Over three years, IMFL compounded at +14.88% per year against +19.33% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +8.27% and +9.46% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +8.73% annualized vs +8.68%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IMFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 14.5% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.3% for IMFL and -29.4% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IMFL charges 0.34% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $5 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IMFL currently yields 2.91% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 66.8% of IMFL's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 88.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
555 positions in common, counted across the 754 positions we hold weights for in IMFL and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 884 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IMFL | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROP:SMRoche Ps Par Ag | 2.76% | 0.69% | 2.07% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag Ordinary Shares | 2.74% | 0.65% | 2.09% |
| SHELShell Plc | 2.62% | 0.57% | 2.05% |
| NESN:SMNestl? Sa | 2.41% | 0.58% | 1.83% |
| ASML:ASASML Holding NV - Ordinary Shares | 0.85% | 1.42% | 0.57% |
| FP:PATotal Se | 1.29% | 0.38% | 0.91% |
| SAF:PASafran | 1.28% | 0.30% | 0.98% |
| III:LN3i Group Plc | 1.46% | 0.09% | 1.37% |
| IBE:MAIberdrola S.A. | 1.18% | 0.37% | 0.81% |
| ABBN:SMABB Ltd. - Ordinary Shares | 1.17% | 0.34% | 0.83% |
66.8% of IMFL is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IMFL or VXUS?
IMFL has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IMFL or VXUS?
Over the past year IMFL returned +23.53% vs +19.86% for VXUS, so IMFL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IMFL annualized +8.68% vs +8.73% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IMFL or VXUS?
IMFL has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 14.5% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: IMFL -33.3% vs VXUS -29.4%.
Should I hold both IMFL and VXUS?
IMFL and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IMFL and VXUS?
At least 66.8% of IMFL's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 555 positions in common, counted across the 754 positions we hold weights for in IMFL and 8,082 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, IMFL or VXUS?
IMFL yields 2.91% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so IMFL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than IMFL?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. IMFL led over 1Y, VXUS over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.