IVV vs LOPP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LOPP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.90% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $16M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.74% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 69 | |
| YTD Return | +12.96% | +12.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.70% | +19.66% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.10% | +16.86% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.40% | +7.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 17.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -25.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Gabelli Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 29, 2021 |
IVV vs LOPP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) is a ETF from Gabelli Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +20.70% while LOPP returned +19.66%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.96% versus a gain of 12.57% for LOPP.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.10% per year against +16.86% for LOPP; over five years the annualized figures are +13.40% and +7.40% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, LOPP has the edge at +9.20% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LOPP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -25.3% for LOPP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LOPP charges 0.90%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $90 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.74% for LOPP.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and LOPP share 22 holdings out of 551 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LOPP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LOPP charges 0.90%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or LOPP?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.70% vs +19.66% for LOPP, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IVV annualized +7.01% vs +9.20% for LOPP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or LOPP?
LOPP has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LOPP -25.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and LOPP?
IVV and LOPP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LOPP?
IVV and LOPP share 22 common holdings with a 3.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 551 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LOPP?
IVV yields 1.10% while LOPP yields 0.74%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.