IVV vs LSAF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF
Which is better, IVV or LSAF?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, LSAF over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. LSAF is less concentrated, with 13.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LSAF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $125M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.55% |
| Holdings | 508 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +11.03% | +19.91%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.62% | +24.98%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.81%Best | +19.91% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.61%Best | +11.00% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7%Best | 19.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -41.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,109Best | $16,851 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 13.2%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | LeaderShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 1, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 2, 2018 to Sep 16, 2026 (8 years).
IVV vs LSAF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
IVV vs LSAF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF) is an ETF from LeaderShares. Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% while LSAF returned +24.98%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.03% versus a gain of 19.91% for LSAF.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.81% per year against +19.91% for LSAF; over five years the annualized figures are +12.61% and +11.00% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.74% annualized vs +10.97%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSAF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 16.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -41.7% for LSAF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LSAF charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.55% for LSAF.
Holdings Overlap
5.2% of IVV's money is in holdings LSAF also owns. 48.9% of LSAF's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
49 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 101 in LSAF, against full books of 508 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 49 positions for LSAF that do not appear in our book for IVV (46.9% of the fund), and 433 for IVV that do not appear in LSAF (93.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in LSAF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VVisa Inc Class A | 0.95% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 0.16% | 1.37% | 1.21% |
| VLOValero Energy | 0.16% | 1.27% | 1.11% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 0.27% | 1.07% | 0.80% |
| DISWalt Disney Co | 0.28% | 1.02% | 0.74% |
| MCKMckesson Corp. | 0.16% | 1.14% | 0.98% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 0.20% | 1.07% | 0.87% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 0.12% | 1.15% | 1.03% |
| ZBRAZebra Technologies Corp | 0.03% | 1.24% | 1.21% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 0.23% | 1.02% | 0.79% |
48.9% of LSAF is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LSAF?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LSAF charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or LSAF?
Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% vs +24.98% for LSAF, so LSAF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +13.74% vs +10.97% for LSAF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or LSAF?
LSAF has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 16.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs LSAF -41.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and LSAF?
IVV and LSAF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LSAF?
48.9% of LSAF's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 48.9% of LSAF's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 49 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 101 in LSAF.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LSAF?
IVV yields 1.06% while LSAF yields 0.55%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LSAF better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, LSAF over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. LSAF is less concentrated, with 13.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.