IVV vs MIGO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs MIG Core ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MIGO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.45% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | - | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | - | |
| Holdings | 508 | 39 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +24.99% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | - | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | - | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -13.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | MIG Capital, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 20, 2026 |
IVV vs MIGO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and MIG Core ETF (MIGO) is a ETF from MIG Capital, LLC. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 24.99% for MIGO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -13.4% for MIGO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MIGO charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MIGO share 19 holdings out of 528 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MIGO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MIGO charges 0.45%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MIGO?
IVV and MIGO share 19 common holdings with a 21.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 528 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.