IVV vs NBET
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. NBET delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NBET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $48M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.44% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 34 | |
| YTD Return | +12.39% | +27.94% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.24% | +32.74% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.78% | +23.41% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.84% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 19.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -18.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Neuberger Berman ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 6, 2022 |
IVV vs NBET Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman ETF Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +20.24% while NBET returned +32.74%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 27.94% for NBET.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.78% per year against +23.41% for NBET. Across the full 4-year window we track, NBET has the edge at +14.36% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -18.7% for NBET. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NBET charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.44% for NBET.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and NBET share 11 holdings out of 525 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NBET?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NBET charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NBET?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.24% vs +32.74% for NBET, so NBET leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +14.36% for NBET. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NBET?
NBET has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NBET -18.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and NBET?
IVV and NBET have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NBET?
IVV and NBET share 11 common holdings with a 2.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 525 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NBET?
IVV yields 1.10% while NBET yields 2.44%, so NBET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.