NBET vs VXUS
Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. NBET delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBET | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $47M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.48% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +25.71% | +15.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.16% | +26.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +19.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 6, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
NBET vs VXUS Performance
Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman ETF Trust and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NBET returned +30.16% while VXUS returned +26.32%. Year to date, NBET is up 25.71% versus a gain of 15.24% for VXUS.
Over three years, NBET compounded at +21.47% per year against +19.85% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, NBET has the edge at +14.01% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.7% for NBET and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBET charges 0.65% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $5 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBET currently yields 2.48% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
NBET and VXUS share 3 holdings out of 7890 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBET or VXUS?
NBET has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $60 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NBET or VXUS?
Over the past year NBET returned +30.16% vs +26.32% for VXUS, so NBET leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NBET annualized +14.01% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NBET or VXUS?
NBET has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: NBET -18.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both NBET and VXUS?
NBET and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NBET and VXUS?
NBET and VXUS share 3 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7890 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBET or VXUS?
NBET yields 2.48% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.