IVV vs NXTI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Simplify Next Intangible Core Index ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NXTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.25% | |
| AUM | $886.7B | $42M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.56% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 202 | |
| YTD Return | +12.13% | +11.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.37% | +15.40% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.91% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.59% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -19.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Simplify Exchange Traded Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 15, 2024 |
IVV vs NXTI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Simplify Next Intangible Core Index ETF (NXTI) is a ETF from Simplify Exchange Traded Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +20.37% while NXTI returned +15.40%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.13% versus a gain of 11.31% for NXTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.7% for NXTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -19.6% for NXTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NXTI charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $25 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.56% for NXTI.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and NXTI share 163 holdings out of 542 unique holdings combined, representing a 24.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NXTI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NXTI charges 0.25%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NXTI?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.37% vs +15.40% for NXTI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +6.97% vs +18.55% for NXTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NXTI?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.7% for NXTI. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NXTI -19.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and NXTI?
IVV and NXTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NXTI?
IVV and NXTI share 163 common holdings with a 24.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 542 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NXTI?
IVV yields 1.10% while NXTI yields 0.56%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.