IVV vs NXTI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Simplify Next Intangible Core Index ETF
Which is better, IVV or NXTI?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. NXTI is less concentrated, with 34.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NXTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.25% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $41M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.53% |
| Holdings | 508 | 202 |
| YTD Return | +14.14%Best | +12.53% |
| 1Y Return | +17.30%Best | +10.94% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.04% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.63% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.7%Best | 13.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -19.6% |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $15,742Best | $15,059 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 34.3%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Simplify Exchange Traded Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 15, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 16, 2024 to Sep 22, 2026 (2.4 years).
IVV vs NXTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
IVV vs NXTI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Simplify Next Intangible Core Index ETF (NXTI) is an ETF from Simplify Exchange Traded Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +17.30% while NXTI returned +10.94%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.14% versus a gain of 12.53% for NXTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NXTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 11.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -19.6% for NXTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NXTI charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $25 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.53% for NXTI.
Holdings Overlap
24.6% of IVV's money is in holdings NXTI also owns. 88.0% of NXTI's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of NXTI is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
160 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 200 in NXTI, against full books of 508 and 202.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 38 positions for NXTI that do not appear in our book for IVV (11.4% of the fund), and 322 for IVV that do not appear in NXTI (74.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in NXTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.65% | 5.23% | 4.58% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.66% | 4.36% | 3.70% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.97% | 4.01% | 3.04% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 0.69% | 4.13% | 3.44% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.39% | 3.13% | 1.74% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 0.20% | 3.37% | 3.17% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 0.33% | 2.74% | 2.41% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 1.01% | 2.02% | 1.01% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.55% | 2.47% | 1.92% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 0.32% | 2.65% | 2.33% |
88.0% of NXTI is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NXTI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NXTI charges 0.25%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or NXTI?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.30% vs +10.94% for NXTI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +20.81% vs +18.60% for NXTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or NXTI?
NXTI has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 11.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs NXTI -19.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and NXTI?
IVV and NXTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NXTI?
88.0% of NXTI's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 88.0% of NXTI's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 160 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 200 in NXTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NXTI?
IVV yields 1.06% while NXTI yields 0.53%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NXTI better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. NXTI is less concentrated, with 34.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.