IVV vs PBUB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Portfolio Building Block US Banks ETF
Which is better, IVV or PBUB?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PBUB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.14% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $970,000 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 19 |
| YTD Return | +13.97%Best | -0.31% |
| 1Y Return | +13.69% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.57% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.56% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9%Best | 68.7% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Portfolio Building Block ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 24, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs PBUB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs PBUB Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Portfolio Building Block US Banks ETF (PBUB) is an ETF from Portfolio Building Block ETFs. Year to date, IVV is up 13.97% versus a loss of 0.31% for PBUB.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PBUB charges 0.14%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $14 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for PBUB.
Holdings Overlap
3.2% of IVV's money is in holdings PBUB also owns. 81.1% of PBUB's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of PBUB is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
13 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 19 in PBUB, against full books of 508 and 19.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 506 and 19 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 487 positions PBUB does not, 96.3% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.44%, AAPL 7.29%, MSFT 5.76%, AMZN 3.68%, GOOGL 3.00%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in PBUB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.34% | 14.68% | 13.34% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.53% | 12.21% | 11.68% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 0.37% | 7.96% | 7.59% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 0.32% | 6.96% | 6.64% |
| FITBFifth Third Bancorp | 0.07% | 4.55% | 4.48% |
| USBUS Bancorp | 0.14% | 4.36% | 4.22% |
| HBANHuntington Bancshares Inc./Oh | 0.05% | 4.41% | 4.36% |
| PNCPnc Financial Services Group Inc. | 0.13% | 4.30% | 4.17% |
| MTBM&T Bank Corp | 0.05% | 4.38% | 4.33% |
| TFCTruist Financial Corp. | 0.09% | 4.32% | 4.23% |
81.1% of PBUB is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PBUB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PBUB charges 0.14%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PBUB?
81.1% of PBUB's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 81.1% of PBUB's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 19 in PBUB.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PBUB?
IVV yields 1.10% while PBUB yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PBUB better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.