IVV vs PEPT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs REX Peptide ETF
Which is better, IVV or PEPT?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PEPT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $850.0B | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 1,018 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +8.54%Best | +8.13% |
| 1Y Return | +10.97% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.51% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.97% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.8%Best | 71.4% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | REX Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 14, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs PEPT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs PEPT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and REX Peptide ETF (PEPT) is an ETF from REX Shares. Year to date, IVV is up 8.54% versus a gain of 8.13% for PEPT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PEPT charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for PEPT.
Holdings Overlap
1.5% of IVV's money is in holdings PEPT also owns. 21.9% of PEPT's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
PEPT and IVV share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 33 in PEPT, against full books of 1,018 and 33.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 16 positions for PEPT that do not appear in our book for IVV (33.9% of the fund), and 497 for IVV that do not appear in PEPT (98.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
21.9% of PEPT is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PEPT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PEPT charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PEPT?
21.9% of PEPT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 21.9% of PEPT's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 33 in PEPT.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PEPT?
IVV yields 1.09% while PEPT yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PEPT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.