IVV vs PSCU
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PSCU | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.29% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $18M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.99% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 36 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +13.61% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +18.15% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +8.58% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | +1.17% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -30.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 7, 2010 |
IVV vs PSCU Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while PSCU returned +18.15%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 13.61% for PSCU.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +8.58% for PSCU; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and +1.17% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +6.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSCU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -30.4% for PSCU. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PSCU charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $29 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.99% for PSCU.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PSCU share 0 holdings out of 539 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PSCU?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PSCU charges 0.29%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PSCU?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +18.15% for PSCU, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +6.45% for PSCU. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PSCU?
PSCU has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PSCU -30.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and PSCU?
IVV and PSCU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PSCU?
IVV and PSCU share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 539 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PSCU?
IVV yields 1.10% while PSCU yields 0.99%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.