PSCU vs VYM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSCU | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $17M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.96% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 40 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +13.00% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.95% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.46% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.75% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2010 | Nov 10, 2006 |
PSCU vs VYM Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSCU returned +20.95% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, PSCU is up 13.00% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, PSCU compounded at +6.46% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +0.75% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.09% annualized vs +6.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSCU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.4% for PSCU and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSCU charges 0.29% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $4 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSCU currently yields 0.96% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
PSCU and VYM share 15 holdings out of 577 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSCU or VYM?
PSCU has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $25 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSCU or VYM?
Over the past year PSCU returned +20.95% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PSCU annualized +6.43% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSCU or VYM?
PSCU has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PSCU -30.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PSCU and VYM?
PSCU and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSCU and VYM?
PSCU and VYM share 15 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 577 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSCU or VYM?
PSCU yields 0.96% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.