IVV vs PWRD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs TCW Transform Systems ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PWRD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $886.7B | $1.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.06% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 34 | |
| YTD Return | +12.64% | +5.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.92% | +15.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.07% | +25.69% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.62% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 23.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -25.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | TCW ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 2, 2022 |
IVV vs PWRD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) is a ETF from TCW ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +20.92% while PWRD returned +15.24%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.64% versus a gain of 5.38% for PWRD.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.07% per year against +25.69% for PWRD. Across the full 5-year window we track, PWRD has the edge at +18.51% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PWRD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -25.9% for PWRD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PWRD charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.06% for PWRD.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PWRD share 15 holdings out of 518 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PWRD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PWRD charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PWRD?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.92% vs +15.24% for PWRD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +18.51% for PWRD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PWRD?
PWRD has been the more volatile fund at 23.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PWRD -25.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and PWRD?
IVV and PWRD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PWRD?
IVV and PWRD share 15 common holdings with a 7.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 518 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PWRD?
IVV yields 1.10% while PWRD yields 0.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.