IVV vs PWRD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs TCW Transform Systems ETF
Which is better, IVV or PWRD?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, PWRD over 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PWRD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.06% |
| Holdings | 508 | 34 |
| YTD Return | +13.85%Best | +7.71% |
| 1Y Return | +18.57%Best | +10.98% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.50% | +28.56%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.34% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6%Best | 23.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.1%Best | -25.9% |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $18,360 | $22,079Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 52.6% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | TCW ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 2, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 3, 2022 to Sep 25, 2026 (4.6 years).
IVV vs PWRD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs PWRD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) is an ETF from TCW ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +18.57% while PWRD returned +10.98%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.85% versus a gain of 7.71% for PWRD.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +23.50% per year against +28.56% for PWRD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PWRD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.3% compared with 15.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.1% for IVV and -25.9% for PWRD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PWRD charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.06% for PWRD.
Holdings Overlap
7.2% of IVV's money is in holdings PWRD also owns. 59.1% of PWRD's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 28 in PWRD, against full books of 508 and 34.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 7 positions for PWRD that do not appear in our book for IVV (22.4% of the fund), and 467 for IVV that do not appear in PWRD (91.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in PWRD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 0.53% | 8.60% | 8.07% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 3.95% | 1.30% |
| VRTVertiv Holdings Co | 0.15% | 5.61% | 5.46% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 0.30% | 5.38% | 5.08% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.55% | 4.75% | 4.20% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 0.27% | 4.57% | 4.30% |
| KLACKla Corp | 0.35% | 4.14% | 3.79% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.01% | 3.33% | 2.32% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 0.36% | 3.41% | 3.05% |
| TTTrane Technologies PLC|125 | 0.15% | 3.48% | 3.33% |
59.1% of PWRD is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PWRD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PWRD charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or PWRD?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.57% vs +10.98% for PWRD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or PWRD?
PWRD has been the more volatile fund at 23.3% annualized versus 15.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -22.1% vs PWRD -25.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and PWRD?
IVV and PWRD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PWRD?
59.1% of PWRD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 59.1% of PWRD's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 28 in PWRD.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PWRD?
IVV yields 1.06% while PWRD yields 0.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PWRD better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, PWRD over 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.