IVV vs QNXT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QNXT delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QNXT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.20% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $28M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.66% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 75 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +18.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +22.91% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 16.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -22.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 23, 2024 |
IVV vs QNXT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while QNXT returned +22.91%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 18.31% for QNXT.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QNXT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -22.1% for QNXT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QNXT charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $20 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.66% for QNXT.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QNXT share 58 holdings out of 519 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QNXT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QNXT charges 0.20%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QNXT?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +22.91% for QNXT, so QNXT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +17.20% for QNXT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QNXT?
QNXT has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QNXT -22.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and QNXT?
IVV and QNXT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QNXT?
IVV and QNXT share 58 common holdings with a 6.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 519 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QNXT?
IVV yields 1.09% while QNXT yields 0.66%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.