IVV vs QNXT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
Which is better, IVV or QNXT?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. QNXT is less concentrated, with 30.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QNXT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.20% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $28M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.65% |
| Holdings | 508 | 75 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | +10.52% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | +10.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 16.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -22.1% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $13,467Best | $12,434 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 30.0%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 23, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.9 years).
IVV vs QNXT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs QNXT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while QNXT returned +10.54%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 10.52% for QNXT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QNXT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 12.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -22.1% for QNXT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QNXT charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $20 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.65% for QNXT.
Holdings Overlap
6.7% of IVV's money is in holdings QNXT also owns. 82.2% of QNXT's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of QNXT is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
57 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 71 in QNXT, against full books of 508 and 75.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 7 positions for QNXT that do not appear in our book for IVV (7.3% of the fund), and 425 for IVV that do not appear in QNXT (91.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in QNXT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.35% | 4.24% | 3.89% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd. | 0.28% | 3.38% | 3.10% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 0.27% | 3.32% | 3.05% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 3 | 0.23% | 2.84% | 2.61% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 0.23% | 2.82% | 2.59% |
| VRTXNvaesrtex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 0.21% | 2.53% | 2.32% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc. | 0.20% | 2.44% | 2.24% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 0.16% | 2.29% | 2.13% |
| SBUXStarbucks Corp | 0.18% | 2.21% | 2.03% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 0.18% | 2.16% | 1.98% |
82.2% of QNXT is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QNXT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QNXT charges 0.20%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or QNXT?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +10.54% for QNXT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +16.96% vs +12.15% for QNXT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or QNXT?
QNXT has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 12.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs QNXT -22.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and QNXT?
IVV and QNXT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QNXT?
82.2% of QNXT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 82.2% of QNXT's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 57 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 71 in QNXT.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QNXT?
IVV yields 1.06% while QNXT yields 0.65%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QNXT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. QNXT is less concentrated, with 30.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.