QNXT vs VYM
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QNXT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $28M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.66% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 75 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +16.80% | +16.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.17% | +25.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QNXT vs VYM Performance
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QNXT returned +22.17% while VYM returned +25.03%. Year to date, QNXT is up 16.80% versus a gain of 16.53% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QNXT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.1% for QNXT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QNXT charges 0.20% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $4 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QNXT currently yields 0.66% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
QNXT and VYM share 19 holdings out of 611 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QNXT or VYM?
QNXT has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QNXT or VYM?
Over the past year QNXT returned +22.17% vs +25.03% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QNXT annualized +16.40% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QNXT or VYM?
QNXT has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QNXT -22.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both QNXT and VYM?
QNXT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QNXT and VYM?
QNXT and VYM share 19 common holdings with a 6.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 611 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QNXT or VYM?
QNXT yields 0.66% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.