IVV vs QTEC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QTEC delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QTEC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.55% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $4.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.01% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 46 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +36.63% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +49.56% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | +28.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | +14.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 22.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -58.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 19, 2006 |
IVV vs QTEC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while QTEC returned +49.56%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 36.63% for QTEC.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +28.96% for QTEC; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +14.12% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, QTEC has the edge at +14.74% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QTEC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -58.9% for QTEC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QTEC charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $55 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.01% for QTEC.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QTEC share 36 holdings out of 516 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QTEC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QTEC charges 0.55%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QTEC?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +49.56% for QTEC, so QTEC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +14.74% for QTEC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QTEC?
QTEC has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QTEC -58.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and QTEC?
IVV and QTEC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QTEC?
IVV and QTEC share 36 common holdings with a 22.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 516 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QTEC?
IVV yields 1.09% while QTEC yields 0.01%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.