IVV vs ROBT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence and Robotics ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | ROBT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $704M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 122 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +13.49% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +21.33% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +11.59% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | +2.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 23.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -44.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 21, 2018 |
IVV vs ROBT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence and Robotics ETF (ROBT) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while ROBT returned +21.33%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 13.49% for ROBT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +11.59% for ROBT; over five years the annualized figures are +13.26% and +2.14% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, ROBT has the edge at +8.60% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ROBT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -44.5% for ROBT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while ROBT charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for ROBT.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and ROBT share 41 holdings out of 578 unique holdings combined, representing a 14.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or ROBT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ROBT charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or ROBT?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +21.33% for ROBT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +8.60% for ROBT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or ROBT?
ROBT has been the more volatile fund at 23.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs ROBT -44.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and ROBT?
IVV and ROBT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and ROBT?
IVV and ROBT share 41 common holdings with a 14.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 578 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or ROBT?
IVV yields 1.09% while ROBT yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.