IVV vs RXI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RXI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.37% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $274M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.45% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 151 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | -0.93% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +4.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | +11.24% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | +4.90% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 18.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -62.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 12, 2006 |
IVV vs RXI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% while RXI returned +4.94%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a loss of 0.93% for RXI.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.19% per year against +11.24% for RXI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and +4.90% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, RXI has the edge at +7.45% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RXI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -62.0% for RXI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RXI charges 0.37%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $37 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.45% for RXI.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and RXI share 47 holdings out of 590 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RXI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RXI charges 0.37%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or RXI?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% vs +4.94% for RXI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +7.06% vs +7.45% for RXI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or RXI?
RXI has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RXI -62.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and RXI?
IVV and RXI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RXI?
IVV and RXI share 47 common holdings with a 9.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 590 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RXI?
IVV yields 1.10% while RXI yields 1.45%, so RXI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.