IVV vs STNC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Hennessy Sustainable ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | STNC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.85% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $93M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.88% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 49 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +10.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +16.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | +12.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | +6.86% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -22.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Hennessy Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 15, 2021 |
IVV vs STNC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Hennessy Sustainable ETF (STNC) is a ETF from Hennessy Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while STNC returned +16.68%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 10.44% for STNC.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.77% per year against +12.08% for STNC; over five years the annualized figures are +13.39% and +6.86% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, STNC has the edge at +8.18% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
STNC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -22.3% for STNC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while STNC charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $85 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.88% for STNC.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and STNC share 4 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or STNC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while STNC charges 0.85%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or STNC?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +16.68% for STNC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +8.18% for STNC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or STNC?
STNC has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs STNC -22.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and STNC?
IVV and STNC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and STNC?
IVV and STNC share 4 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or STNC?
IVV yields 1.09% while STNC yields 0.88%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.