IVV vs TINT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Proshares Smart Materials ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TINT delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TINT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.58% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $2M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.18% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 31 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +19.04% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +26.56% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +9.05% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 23.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -41.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 26, 2021 |
IVV vs TINT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Proshares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while TINT returned +26.56%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 19.04% for TINT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +9.05% for TINT. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +1.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TINT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -41.5% for TINT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TINT charges 0.58%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $58 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.18% for TINT.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TINT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TINT charges 0.58%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TINT?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +26.56% for TINT, so TINT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +1.39% for TINT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TINT?
TINT has been the more volatile fund at 23.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TINT -41.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and TINT?
IVV and TINT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TINT?
IVV and TINT share 2 common holdings with a 4.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 533 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TINT?
IVV yields 1.10% while TINT yields 1.18%, so TINT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.