IVV vs TXUG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Thornburg International Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TXUG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.70% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $4M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.45% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 43 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +13.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +11.20% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -18.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Thornburg Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 23, 2025 |
IVV vs TXUG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Thornburg International Growth ETF (TXUG) is a ETF from Thornburg Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while TXUG returned +11.20%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 13.95% for TXUG.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.8% for TXUG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -18.6% for TXUG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TXUG charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $70 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.45% for TXUG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TXUG share 6 holdings out of 541 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TXUG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TXUG charges 0.70%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TXUG?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +11.20% for TXUG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +8.52% for TXUG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TXUG?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.8% for TXUG. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TXUG -18.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and TXUG?
IVV and TXUG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TXUG?
IVV and TXUG share 6 common holdings with a 5.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 541 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TXUG?
IVV yields 1.09% while TXUG yields 0.45%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.