IVV vs TXUG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Thornburg International Growth ETF
Which is better, IVV or TXUG?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TXUG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.70% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $4M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.46% |
| Holdings | 508 | 42 |
| YTD Return | +13.39%Best | +11.04% |
| 1Y Return | +20.08%Best | +8.29% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9%Best | 14.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -18.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $12,836Best | $11,052 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 44.7% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Thornburg Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 23, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 23, 2025 to Sep 4, 2026 (1.6 years).
IVV vs TXUG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TXUG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Thornburg International Growth ETF (TXUG) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% while TXUG returned +8.29%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.39% versus a gain of 11.04% for TXUG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TXUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 12.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -18.6% for TXUG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TXUG charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $70 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.46% for TXUG.
Holdings Overlap
14.3% of IVV's money is in holdings TXUG also owns. 13.6% of TXUG's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
IVV and TXUG share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 66 days apart, IVV as of Aug 5, 2026 and TXUG as of May 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
6 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 42 in TXUG, against full books of 508 and 42.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 5 positions for TXUG that do not appear in our book for IVV (8.0% of the fund), and 491 for IVV that do not appear in TXUG (85.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and TXUG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TXUG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TXUG charges 0.70%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TXUG?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% vs +8.29% for TXUG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +16.89% vs +6.45% for TXUG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TXUG?
TXUG has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 12.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs TXUG -18.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and TXUG?
IVV and TXUG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TXUG?
14.3% of IVV's money is in holdings TXUG also owns. 13.6% of TXUG's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 42 in TXUG.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TXUG?
IVV yields 1.10% while TXUG yields 0.46%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TXUG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.