IVV vs WUGI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs AXS Esoterica NextG Economy ETF
Which is better, IVV or WUGI?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and 5Y, WUGI over 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WUGI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.84% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $31M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.24% |
| Holdings | 508 | 34 |
| YTD Return | +12.24% | +18.42%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.61%Best | -2.46% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.98% | +23.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.76%Best | +8.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9%Best | 28.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5%Best | -56.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,230Best | $14,789 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 58.3% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | AXS Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 31, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 31, 2020 to Sep 9, 2026 (6.4 years).
IVV vs WUGI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.4 years both funds cover.
IVV vs WUGI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and AXS Esoterica NextG Economy ETF (WUGI) is an ETF from AXS Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% while WUGI returned -2.46%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.24% versus a gain of 18.42% for WUGI.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.98% per year against +23.97% for WUGI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.76% and +8.14% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, WUGI has the edge at +21.37% annualized vs +19.79%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WUGI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.7% compared with 15.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for IVV and -56.4% for WUGI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WUGI charges 0.84%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $84 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.24% for WUGI.
Holdings Overlap
25.5% of IVV's money is in holdings WUGI also owns. 68.0% of WUGI's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 31 in WUGI, against full books of 508 and 34.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 8 positions for WUGI that do not appear in our book for IVV (14.7% of the fund), and 476 for IVV that do not appear in WUGI (73.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in WUGI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 6.12% | 1.86% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.01% | 5.67% | 1.66% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.51% | 6.92% | 5.41% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.98% | 4.37% | 1.39% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.56% | 4.70% | 2.14% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.64% | 5.94% | 5.30% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 1.18% | 5.10% | 3.92% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd | 0.28% | 4.76% | 4.48% |
| INTCIntel Corp. | 0.72% | 3.70% | 2.98% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 0.30% | 3.59% | 3.29% |
68.0% of WUGI is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WUGI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WUGI charges 0.84%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $81 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or WUGI?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% vs -2.46% for WUGI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IVV annualized +19.79% vs +21.37% for WUGI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or WUGI?
WUGI has been the more volatile fund at 28.7% annualized versus 15.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -24.5% vs WUGI -56.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and WUGI?
IVV and WUGI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WUGI?
68.0% of WUGI's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 68.0% of WUGI's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 31 in WUGI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WUGI?
IVV yields 1.06% while WUGI yields 0.24%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WUGI better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and 5Y, WUGI over 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.