IVV vs WUGI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs AXS Esoterica NextG Economy ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WUGI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.79% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $33M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.25% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 26 | |
| YTD Return | +13.22% | +15.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.62% | +0.46% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.17% | +23.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.42% | +9.46% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 28.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -56.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | AXS Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 31, 2020 |
IVV vs WUGI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and AXS Esoterica NextG Economy ETF (WUGI) is a ETF from AXS Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +21.62% while WUGI returned +0.46%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.22% versus a gain of 15.44% for WUGI.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.17% per year against +23.85% for WUGI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.42% and +9.46% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, WUGI has the edge at +21.10% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WUGI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -56.4% for WUGI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WUGI charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.25% for WUGI.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and WUGI share 17 holdings out of 517 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WUGI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WUGI charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or WUGI?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.62% vs +0.46% for WUGI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IVV annualized +7.02% vs +21.10% for WUGI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or WUGI?
WUGI has been the more volatile fund at 28.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs WUGI -56.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and WUGI?
IVV and WUGI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WUGI?
IVV and WUGI share 17 common holdings with a 22.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 517 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WUGI?
IVV yields 1.10% while WUGI yields 0.25%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.