IVV vs XDAT

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVXDATWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.50%
AUM$865.2B$4M
Dividend Yield1.09%0.00%
Holdings50862
YTD Return+13.80%+3.62%
1Y Return+23.70%-0.54%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.49%+13.09%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.43%-1.35%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%24.1%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-54.9%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Franklin Templeton Investments (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jan 12, 2021

IVV vs XDAT Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while XDAT returned -0.54%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 3.62% for XDAT.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +13.09% for XDAT; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and -1.35% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +1.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

XDAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -54.9% for XDAT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while XDAT charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for XDAT.

Holdings Overlap

13.8%overlap

IVV and XDAT share 29 holdings out of 536 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in XDATDifference
GOOGL3.15%9.69%6.54%
META2.19%6.44%4.25%
MSFT4.57%3.52%1.05%
APPProProPro
PANWProProPro
CRWDProProPro
DDOGProProPro
ORCLProProPro
ANETProProPro
SNDKProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with XDAT
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$99/yr Pro · 7-day refund

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or XDAT?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XDAT charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or XDAT?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs -0.54% for XDAT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +1.08% for XDAT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or XDAT?

XDAT has been the more volatile fund at 24.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs XDAT -54.9%.

Should I hold both IVV and XDAT?

IVV and XDAT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and XDAT?

IVV and XDAT share 29 common holdings with a 13.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 536 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XDAT?

IVV yields 1.09% while XDAT yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

X-ray your whole portfolio
$99/yr7-day refund. ETFs, mutual funds, 401(k)s.
Get Pro →