IVV vs XPND
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XPND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $41M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.08% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 51 | |
| YTD Return | +12.39% | +8.32% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.24% | +14.46% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.78% | +23.10% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.84% | +12.55% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 21.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -38.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 14, 2021 |
IVV vs XPND Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and First Trust Expanded Technology ETF (XPND) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +20.24% while XPND returned +14.46%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 8.32% for XPND.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.78% per year against +23.10% for XPND; over five years the annualized figures are +12.84% and +12.55% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, XPND has the edge at +13.83% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XPND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -38.0% for XPND. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XPND charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.08% for XPND.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and XPND share 40 holdings out of 515 unique holdings combined, representing a 24.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XPND?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XPND charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or XPND?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.24% vs +14.46% for XPND, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +13.83% for XPND. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or XPND?
XPND has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs XPND -38.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and XPND?
IVV and XPND have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and XPND?
IVV and XPND share 40 common holdings with a 24.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 515 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XPND?
IVV yields 1.10% while XPND yields 0.08%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.