IVV vs XUDV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Franklin US Dividend Booster Index ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. XUDV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XUDV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $81M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 3.36% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 96 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +27.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +32.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 10.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -16.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 21, 2025 |
IVV vs XUDV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Franklin US Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while XUDV returned +32.63%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 27.78% for XUDV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.6% for XUDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -16.0% for XUDV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XUDV charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $9 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 3.36% for XUDV.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and XUDV share 83 holdings out of 514 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XUDV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XUDV charges 0.09%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or XUDV?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +32.63% for XUDV, so XUDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +23.76% for XUDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or XUDV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.6% for XUDV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs XUDV -16.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and XUDV?
IVV and XUDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and XUDV?
IVV and XUDV share 83 common holdings with a 8.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 514 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XUDV?
IVV yields 1.10% while XUDV yields 3.36%, so XUDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.