VYM vs XUDV
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs Franklin US Dividend Booster Index ETF
Which is better, VYM or XUDV?
XUDV has been ahead.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. XUDV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VYM | XUDV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04%Best | 0.09% |
| AUM | $83.1B | $76M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.22% | 3.23% |
| Holdings | 608 | 97 |
| YTD Return | +10.00% | +20.41%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.75% | +21.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.81% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.63% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.3%Best | 11.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.5%Best | -16.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $12,302 | $13,198Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.1%Best | 44.8% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2006 | Jan 21, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 23, 2025 to Oct 2, 2026 (1.7 years).
VYM vs XUDV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
VYM vs XUDV Performance
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Franklin US Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year VYM returned +13.75% while XUDV returned +21.61%. Year to date, VYM is up 10.00% versus a gain of 20.41% for XUDV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XUDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.6% compared with 10.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.5% for VYM and -16.0% for XUDV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VYM charges 0.04% per year while XUDV charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $9 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.22% against 3.23% for XUDV.
Holdings Overlap
31.5% of VYM's money is in holdings XUDV also owns. 90.7% of XUDV's money is in holdings VYM also owns.
Most of XUDV is already inside VYM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, VYM as of Jul 31, 2026 and XUDV as of Sep 15, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
70 positions in common, counted across the 557 positions we hold weights for in VYM and 92 in XUDV, against full books of 608 and 97.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 21 positions for XUDV that do not appear in our book for VYM (9.0% of the fund), and 458 for VYM that do not appear in XUDV (65.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VYM | Weight in XUDV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFEPfizer Inc | 0.58% | 5.09% | 4.51% |
| VZVerizon Communications Inc Vz | 0.80% | 4.80% | 4.00% |
| UPSUnited Parcel Service, Inc | 0.32% | 4.44% | 4.12% |
| HPQHP Inc | 0.10% | 4.65% | 4.55% |
| KHCKraft Heinz Co. | 0.09% | 4.61% | 4.52% |
| BBYBest Buy Co Inc | 0.07% | 4.59% | 4.52% |
| MOAltria Group Inc. | 0.46% | 4.19% | 3.73% |
| GISGeneral Mills In | 0.08% | 4.45% | 4.37% |
| PAYXPaychex, Inc. | 0.15% | 4.22% | 4.07% |
| OKEOneok | 0.23% | 3.76% | 3.53% |
90.7% of XUDV is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VYM or XUDV?
VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while XUDV charges 0.09%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VYM or XUDV?
Over the past year VYM returned +13.75% vs +21.61% for XUDV, so XUDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), VYM annualized +12.96% vs +17.73% for XUDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VYM or XUDV?
XUDV has been the more volatile fund at 11.6% annualized versus 10.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: VYM -14.5% vs XUDV -16.0%.
Should I hold both VYM and XUDV?
VYM and XUDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VYM and XUDV?
90.7% of XUDV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 90.7% of XUDV's is in holdings VYM also owns. They hold 70 positions in common, counted across the 557 positions we hold weights for in VYM and 92 in XUDV.
Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or XUDV?
VYM yields 2.22% while XUDV yields 3.23%, so XUDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XUDV better than VYM?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. XUDV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.