JRI vs VOO
Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JRI | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.97% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.87% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 413 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -0.57% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.00% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.68% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.47% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -64.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 25, 2012 | Sep 7, 2010 |
JRI vs VOO Performance
Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund (JRI) is a ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JRI returned +6.00% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, JRI is down 0.57% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, JRI compounded at +16.68% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +5.47% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +1.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JRI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.3% for JRI and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JRI charges 3.97% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $397 vs $3 annually, a gap of $394 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JRI currently yields 11.87% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
JRI and VOO share 43 holdings out of 709 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JRI or VOO?
JRI has an expense ratio of 3.97% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $394 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JRI or VOO?
Over the past year JRI returned +6.00% vs +21.79% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), JRI annualized +1.01% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JRI or VOO?
JRI has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: JRI -64.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both JRI and VOO?
JRI and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JRI and VOO?
JRI and VOO share 43 common holdings with a 2.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 709 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JRI or VOO?
JRI yields 11.87% while VOO yields 1.08%, so JRI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.