KBWB vs VTI
Invesco KBW Bank ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, KBWB or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. KBWB led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KBWB | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $6.7B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.95% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 30 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +13.56%Best | +11.65% |
| 1Y Return | +27.41%Best | +17.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +35.99%Best | +20.35% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.45% | +11.72%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.9% | 14.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -52.0% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,195 | $17,404Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 1, 2011 to Sep 10, 2026 (14.9 years).
KBWB vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.
KBWB vs VTI Performance
Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KBWB returned +27.41% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, KBWB is up 13.56% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.
Over three years, KBWB compounded at +35.99% per year against +20.35% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.45% and +11.72% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.35% annualized vs +12.31%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KBWB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.9% compared with 14.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.0% for KBWB and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KBWB charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KBWB currently yields 1.95% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 98.9% of KBWB's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of KBWB is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
23 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in KBWB and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 30 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KBWB | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 8.44% | 1.11% | 7.33% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 8.62% | 0.50% | 8.12% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 8.06% | 0.35% | 7.71% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 7.42% | 0.34% | 7.08% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc. | 7.26% | 0.39% | 6.87% |
| COFCapital One Financial Corp. | 4.17% | 0.17% | 4.00% |
| STTState Street Corp. | 4.21% | 0.06% | 4.15% |
| USBUS Bancorp | 4.14% | 0.13% | 4.01% |
| PNCPnc Financial Services Group Inc. | 4.10% | 0.14% | 3.96% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 3.86% | 0.32% | 3.54% |
98.9% of KBWB is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KBWB or VTI?
KBWB has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KBWB or VTI?
Over the past year KBWB returned +27.41% vs +17.34% for VTI, so KBWB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), KBWB annualized +12.31% vs +13.35% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KBWB or VTI?
KBWB has been the more volatile fund at 23.9% annualized versus 14.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KBWB -52.0% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both KBWB and VTI?
KBWB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KBWB and VTI?
At least 98.9% of KBWB's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in KBWB and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, KBWB or VTI?
KBWB yields 1.95% while VTI yields 1.03%, so KBWB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than KBWB?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. KBWB led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.