KEAT vs QQQ
Keating Active ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KEAT | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $122M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.51% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 30 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +16.38% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.84% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Keating Investment Counselors | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 27, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
KEAT vs QQQ Performance
Keating Active ETF (KEAT) is a ETF from Keating Investment Counselors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year KEAT returned +26.84% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, KEAT is up 16.38% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 12.3% for KEAT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.6% for KEAT and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.16. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KEAT charges 0.85% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $18 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KEAT currently yields 2.51% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
KEAT and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 131 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KEAT or QQQ?
KEAT has an expense ratio of 0.85% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KEAT or QQQ?
Over the past year KEAT returned +26.84% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), KEAT annualized +17.47% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KEAT or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 12.3% for KEAT. Worst drawdown: KEAT -10.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both KEAT and QQQ?
KEAT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.16, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KEAT and QQQ?
KEAT and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 131 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KEAT or QQQ?
KEAT yields 2.51% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so KEAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.